Best Running Shorts for Men 2026: 8 Lined & Linerless Picks
A good pair of running shorts should disappear once you start moving. For most runners, the real decisions are simple: lined or linerless, how much storage you need, and whether you prefer a shorter 5 inch feel or more coverage. These eight picks cover road running, long runs, trail, gym crossover and budget options without making you sort through two separate top-five lists.

Brooks Journey 7″
The Journey 7" moves to #1 because it gets the road-running basics right, adds useful storage and gives more thigh coverage than the 5" version. Justin prefers the 7" length because it feels better for his everyday and longer runs.
Choose your shorts in 20 seconds
Start with where you run and whether you want a built-in liner.


Patagonia Strider Pro
Very light with five useful pockets.
See the Patagonia pick →

CRZ YOGA 2 in 1
Compression-style liner for running and gym use.
See the CRZ YOGA pick →
Lululemon Fast and Free
Polished fit with a supportive running-specific liner.
See the Lululemon pick →
Path Projects Graves PX
Durable linerless option with secure zip storage.
See the Path Projects pick →The 8 Best Running Shorts for Men in 2026
Brooks Journey 7″

Good choice if: you want a lined road short with more thigh coverage for daily running, long runs and carrying your phone or fuel.
Check Brooks Journey PriceThe Journey 7″ is built around distance running rather than general gym use. Brooks uses a flat waistband, stretch brief liner and lightweight four-way-stretch shell, while the storage is unusually good for a road short.
A zippered rear pocket handles a phone, four expandable hip pockets give you room for gels, and a separate key pocket keeps small items out of the way. Justin prefers this 7" version to the 5", which gives the top pick a real first-hand fit preference as well as strong current testing.
What Works
- Excellent storage for a road short
- Flat waistband and flexible shell
- Brief liner built for running
- Strong daily and long-run role
Watch For
- Brief liner will not suit everyone
- Patagonia is stronger for trail storage
- Not the cheapest choice
Patagonia Strider Pro 5″

Good choice if: you want a very light lined short that can carry more gear than most road shorts.
See Strider Pro at PatagoniaPatagonia still has the strongest independent consensus for trail and ultra use. The Strider Pro combines a very light shell with five pockets and bonded construction that keeps the short simple even when you are carrying fuel.
If you mostly run roads, I prefer the Brooks Journey as the all-around recommendation. If you spend hours on trail or want to carry more without a vest, the Strider Pro is the better specialist.
What Works
- Five useful storage pockets
- Very light construction
- Strong long-distance testing history
- 5″ and 7″ versions
Watch For
- Premium price
- Brief liner only
- More trail-focused than Brooks Journey
ASICS Road 5″

Good choice if: you want a dependable lined short without moving into premium pricing.
Check ASICS Road PriceThis is one of the picks I actually run in. The Road 5″ is simple, light and flexible, with side mesh panels, a flat waistband and practical storage. It does not try to turn the waistband into a full running belt.
ASICS also offers the Road 2N1 if you prefer a light compression-style inner short instead of the standard lined setup.
What Works
- First-hand daily-running pick
- Light and flexible shell
- Flat waistband
- 2-in-1 version available
Watch For
- Less storage than Brooks or Patagonia
- Basic rather than premium feel
- Choose the 2N1 if you want more thigh coverage
CRZ YOGA 2 in 1 Running Shorts

Good choice if: you prefer a longer inner liner and want one pair for running and gym sessions.
Check CRZ YOGA PriceCRZ YOGA is the value play if you prefer a boxer-brief liner. The inner layer gives more thigh coverage than the brief liners in Brooks and Patagonia, which can feel better for runners who are prone to inner-thigh rubbing.
I also use these for gym sessions. The tradeoff is that the fabric does not feel as light or refined as the premium shorts above, especially when it gets soaked.
What Works
- Useful boxer-brief liner
- Good running and gym crossover
- Budget-friendly
- 5″ and 7″ choices
Watch For
- Heavier feel when wet
- Liner fit is more noticeable than a brief
- Premium shorts dry and disappear better
Lululemon Fast and Free Lined 5″

Good choice if: you want a polished running-specific liner and storage integrated into the short.
See Fast and Free at LululemonThe current Fast and Free 5″ has a more running-specific setup than a general training short. The liner includes supportive shaping and phone sleeves, while hidden gel storage keeps the outer shell fairly clean.
It is expensive, so I would not call it the best value. It makes sense if fit, finish and carrying a phone close to the body are worth paying for.
What Works
- Running-specific supportive liner
- Phone sleeves built into liner
- Hidden gel storage
- Streamlined fit
Watch For
- Premium price
- More complex than a simple brief-lined short
- Not necessary if ASICS Road already fits you well
Path Projects Graves PX

Good choice if: you want to choose your own base layer but still need secure phone and key storage.
See Graves PX at Path ProjectsGraves PX is the strongest dedicated linerless option in the main list. The shell uses four-way-stretch Primeflex fabric and gives you two side zip pockets, a rear no-bounce phone pocket and an internal key pocket.
Path Projects designs its shorts around a separate base-liner system, but you can pair them with running underwear you already know works for you.
What Works
- Purpose-built linerless system
- Secure zip storage
- Durable stretch fabric
- 5″ and 7″ lengths
Watch For
- Requires separate underwear or liner
- Premium price for shell only
- Less widely stocked than major brands
Nike Stride Dri-FIT Unlined

Good choice if: you want a straightforward linerless short that is easy to find and replace.
Check Nike Stride PriceThe Nike Stride is the easier-to-buy alternative to Path Projects. It uses lightweight Dri-FIT fabric, a breathable back panel and familiar side-pocket storage with a secure rear pocket.
It does not have the specialised storage system of Graves PX, but that can be a positive if you just want a conventional linerless short from a widely available brand.
What Works
- Widely available
- Light Dri-FIT shell
- Useful rear zip pocket
- 5″ and 7″ options
Watch For
- Requires a separate base layer
- Less storage than Graves PX
- More conventional than specialised
Patagonia Trailfarer 6″

Good choice if: you want a simple, light Patagonia shell and prefer choosing your own base layer.
See Trailfarer at PatagoniaTrailfarer is the minimalist Patagonia option. It is linerless, light, quick drying and less storage-heavy than Strider Pro. The 6 inch length splits the difference between common 5 and 7 inch shorts.
Choose it when you want Patagonia fabric and a simple shell rather than the integrated liner and five-pocket system of the Strider Pro.
What Works
- Light linerless construction
- Stretch and moisture management
- Useful 6″ middle-ground length
- Simple trail crossover
Watch For
- Less storage than Strider Pro
- Requires separate underwear
- Only one main inseam length
Compare the 8 Picks
Swipe sideways to compare all columns →
| Shorts | Best For | Liner | Length | Storage | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooks Journey Best Road | Daily + long road runs | Brief | 7″ | Excellent | Amazon |
| Patagonia Strider Pro | Trail + ultra | Brief | 5″/7″ | Excellent | Patagonia |
| ASICS Road | Value + daily training | Lined | 5″ | Good | Amazon |
| CRZ YOGA 2 in 1 | Budget + gym | Boxer brief | 5″/7″ | Good | Amazon |
| Lululemon Fast and Free | Premium lined | Supportive | 5″ | Very good | Lululemon |
| Path Projects Graves PX | Best linerless | None | 5″/7″ | Excellent | Path |
| Nike Stride | Everyday linerless | None | 5″/7″ | Good | Amazon |
| Patagonia Trailfarer | Light linerless trail | None | 6″ | Light | Patagonia |
Two Excellent Shorts I Would Not Ignore
Janji AFO Middle 5″
One of the strongest independent 2026 performers for low weight, quick drying and waistband comfort. The tradeoff is limited storage compared with Brooks and Patagonia.
Tracksmith Session 5″
A premium comfort option with a smooth liner, streamlined waistband and four pockets. It is expensive, which keeps it out of my main value-focused eight.
How to Choose Men’s Running Shorts
First decide whether you want a liner
Brief liners use less fabric and usually feel cooler. Boxer-brief liners add more thigh coverage. Linerless shorts let you use your favourite running underwear. None is automatically better.
Five inches is the easiest place to start
A 5 inch inseam gives most runners good leg freedom without feeling extremely short. Go longer if you prefer coverage and shorter if you like a race-style feel.
Storage matters more as runs get longer
For a 30 minute run, you may only need a key pocket. For long runs, phone and gel storage can decide whether a short is genuinely useful. Brooks Journey and Patagonia Strider Pro stand out here.
Do not overpay for features you will not use
Premium fabric and carefully designed liners can feel better, but a straightforward ASICS Road or CRZ YOGA short may be all you need. Spend more when the liner, storage or fabric solves a problem you actually have.
Chafing is usually a fit-and-friction problem
Look for fabric that stays in place without squeezing and seams that do not rub. An anti-chafe product can help on longer runs. Cotton tends to hold more moisture than technical synthetics, so it is usually less comfortable once you are sweating heavily.





